keratin.com, hair loss, baldness, alopecia, disease, and treatment information

are classification systems still important in today's hair loss research ?

Hair Biology
Diagnosis / Decisions
Androgenetic Alopecia Biology
Androgenetic Alopecia Clinical Patterns
Androgenetic Alopecia Treatments
Hair Restoration
Alopecia Areata
Effluviums
Scarring Alopecias
Inflammatory Alopecias
Other Alopecias
Hair Shaft Defects
Infectious Hair Disease
Hirsutism / Hypertrichosis
Hair Color
Hair Cosmetics
Bits and Pieces
Immunology
Discussion Forums
Personal / Site Information


Are classification systems still important in today's hair loss research

Yes these simple classification tables are still used but they have been modified from Dr Hamilton's original system and the information providied by classification is supplemented with other objective and subjective forms of hair loss analysis.

Today researchers most frequently use the Norwood modification of Hamilton's classification. Norwood in 1975 published a classification table that had seven categories and five variants. Norwood got rid of Hamilton's type I group for people with no hair loss believeing it was not useful and potentially confusing to readers of research reports.

Norwood also ignored the subgroups for people with high hairlines and those with a senile pattern of hairloss that Hamilton had previously suggested.


Are classification systems still important in today's hair loss research references

  • Norwood OT. Hair Transplant Surgery. Charles C Thomas Publishers, Springfield IL, USA, 1973. ISBN 0-398-02892-3

Top of the page

Copyright ©. All Rights Reserved
http://www.keratin.com
Top of the page