|
Why
does minoxidil work better for women than for men
It may be that minoxidil is better able to penetrate the skin of
women compared to men. The potential for greater drug penetrance
is shown by the increased risk of systemic hair growth occurring
in women using minoxidil compared to men. This is the reason why
5% minoxidil is not recommended for use by women. Women using 5%
minoxidil in clinical trials were inclined to grow hair in areas
where minoxidil was not applied. This suggests minoxidil is more
likely to get into the blood stream of women and cause systemic
hair growth as compared to men. This could be a dangerous situation
as minoxidil is a vasodilatory drug used orally to treat blood pressure
problems. Someone with normal blood pressure who takes minoxidil
that enters the blood stream may develop low blood pressure.
In addition, the female hair loss pattern makes hair growth more
likely with any treatment. Female pattern baldness is usually a
diffuse thinning rather than recession of the hair line. The thinning
hair involves a gradual reduction in size of the hair follicles
and these types of follicles are ideal for minoxidil products to
have greatest effect.
Why
does minoxidil work better for women than for men references
- Boeck C, Parker J, Shank J, Hordinsky M.
Safety of long term therapy with 3% and 5% topical minoxidil in
female androgenetic alopecia. In: van Nest D, Randall VA (eds).
Hair Research for the next millenium. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996,
61-5.
- Jacobs JP, Szpunar CA, Warner ML. Use of
topical minoxidil therapy for androgenetic alopecia in women.
Int J Dermatol. 1993 Oct;32(10):758-62.
- Whiting
DA, Jacobson C. Treatment of female androgenetic alopecia with
minoxidil 2%. Int J Dermatol. 1992 Nov;31(11):800-4.
- Hordinsky
MK, Shank J. Three percent topical minoxidil therapy for female
androgenetic alopecia. Clin Dermatol. 1988 Oct-Dec;6(4):213-7.
- DeVillez
RL, Jacobs JP, Szpunar CA, Warner ML. Androgenetic alopecia in
the female. Treatment with 2% topical minoxidil solution. Arch
Dermatol. 1994 Mar;130(3):303-7.
|