keratin.com, hair loss, baldness, alopecia, disease, and treatment information

evolution of immunity I

Hair Biology
Diagnosis / Decisions
Androgenetic Alopecia Biology
Androgenetic Alopecia Clinical Patterns
Androgenetic Alopecia Treatments
Hair Restoration
Alopecia Areata
Effluviums
Scarring Alopecias
Inflammatory Alopecias
Other Alopecias
Hair Shaft Defects
Infectious Hair Disease
Hirsutism / Hypertrichosis
Hair Color
Hair Cosmetics
Bits and Pieces
Immunology
Discussion Forums
Personal / Site Information


Introduction

Why explain non-human immunity? Cos I'm a zoologist that's why! Despite working as a clinical geneticist/dermatologist/immunologist I started out studying zoology, one aspect of which involved learning about the evolutionary development of the immune system. I believe it is important to show that there is more than one method of immunological defense that mother nature has developed. The human immune system is just one of many successful mechanisms that operate in the animal world. The human system is also the most advanced and complex and the more complex a system the greater the potential for things to go wrong. To reach a level of understanding of the complex system that will allow us to understand why malfunctions such as autoimmunity and immune deficiency develop, we have to strip the system down to its basic components and their functions. The next article will address what individual cells of the immune system do and how they do it. Before we come to that, we have to ask why we need a defense function at all and how has it become so complex?


Why have an immune system in the first place?

An organism's integrity is under daily threat from external sources. The integrity of the individual must be protected from challenges which can be grouped into five main categories.

1) Competition for survival. We live on an over populated world. Not just humans but many species within their own spatial niches are competing for limited space and food.

2) To protect against assimilation. The constant battle involves avoiding cell fusion. Single cell organisms can be readily fused together. A more aggressive species or subspecies may attempt to "assimilate" non-aggressive or weaker cells into the more aggressive population. In this way the aggressive cell population reduces the competition for food space and light and may obtain added advantages from receiving some of the weaker population's DNA. At the single cell level, fusion can be accomplished between widely different species and the remnants of this cell fusion acceptance can be observed in humans. Siamese twins are the result of partial fusion of embryos. Frequently, one twin becomes dominant over the other. This twin will try to assimilate the other (unconsciously of course) and will thrive while the other becomes steadily weaker. Extreme examples of this dominance of one Siamese twin over another may be observed in the total assimilation of one twin while still within the womb. The only clue to this assimilation may be the Fossilized remnants of weaker twin revealed during X-ray of the survivor.

3) To protect against organ damage and aid repair. Penetration of the body by a sharp rock. An extremity lost during a fight. A tissue succumbing to attack by bacteria. These, and other destroyers of tissue, can endanger the welfare of an individual.

4) To protect against Parasitism. A parasite is an organism that lives on another organism and depends on it entirely for nourishment and protection. Within this definition we can include macroscopic parasites such as tape worms and microscopic "parasites" (pathogens). Every species is the potential host for numerous parasites. The parasite may feed on the host to exhaustion and ultimate death, or the parasite may remain almost unnoticed. Regardless, parasites are a threat to the host's integrity and welfare. At the very least they compromise the host by taking nourishment intended for the host's cells. At worst they hijack the host's body functions for the use of the parasite leading ultimately to death of the host.

Microorganisms are perhaps the greatest threat to humans. While some are benign others have the ability to cause disease (dis-ease) in other words they have pathogenicity, they are pathogenic organisms. Invasion of the host is an infection and if transfer from host to host is possible, then the pathogen is capable of infectious disease and the initiation of an epidemic within a host population.

5) Regulation of integrity. Multi-celled organisms develop from a highly regulated division of cells. Variants or mutants may occur during duplication of cells in the development and maintenance of the individual. These variant cells may be the result of viral contamination, chemical modification, or even the imperfect cell division mechanisms and duplication of DNA. At best the variant cells are benign, they simply take up space and nutrients. At worst, the cells are a threat to the host integrity, proliferating out of control, threatening to use up all the nutrients and resources available. They are neoplasms or tumors.

In this sense, the variant cells are very much parasites except the danger comes from the individual's own cells rather than a different, invading species. Regardless of being benign or cancerous, the variant cells are a draw back compromising the optimum functioning of the individual. THEY MUST BE REMOVED.


Defense of self

The object of the individual is to survive as an individual. To maintain integrity organisms have developed passive and aggressive defense mechanisms. we will discuss some of the passive mechanisms operating in mammals in the next chapter. Here we will briefly look at passive biochemical and cellular defenses in some invertebrates as well as examining the development of more aggressive defense activity.

The vertebrate immune system is a highly complex and interactive system. It was not developed overnight. While it is difficult to recognize that specific order of immune system development, we can suggest an overall evolutionary time line from examining other vertebrate and invertebrate species and comparing the complexity of their defense mechanisms to ours. There are many risks in this approach. We don't fully understand the evolution of vertebrates or what their common ancestor was. The immune system of all vertebrate species today is very similar which suggests that the immune system developed very rapidly with the evolution of invertebrates. Our understanding of invertebrate evolution has a lot of gaps in it. With the extinction of many species and the evolutionary orders they represent, we have lost many valuable clues about immune system development.

Defense of self is the overriding object and there are many forms of defense reaction operating in the invertebrate world. Some are evolutionary dead ends but others may have implications for our immune system. The point however is that there is more than one method of individual defense that successfully operates on this planet.

Top of the page

Copyright ©. All Rights Reserved
http://www.keratin.com
Top of the page