keratin.com, hair loss, baldness, alopecia, disease, and treatment information

hair transplant associated pain reduction techniques

Hair Biology
Diagnosis / Decisions
Androgenetic Alopecia Biology
Androgenetic Alopecia Clinical Patterns
Androgenetic Alopecia Treatments
Hair Restoration
Alopecia Areata
Effluviums
Scarring Alopecias
Inflammatory Alopecias
Other Alopecias
Hair Shaft Defects
Infectious Hair Disease
Hirsutism / Hypertrichosis
Hair Color
Hair Cosmetics
Bits and Pieces
Immunology
Discussion Forums
Personal / Site Information


Hair transplant associated pain reduction techniques

Most often doctors and pain are so closely associated that people tend to avoid them as much as possible. The doctor has to answer the primary question “does it hurt?” as a preliminary confidence booster before any procedure of treatment. This fear of pain extends to hair transplantation and when a patient who has already undergone such a procedure has felt pain, he may not be willing to follow up with a second procedure. As a result the hair transplant is not complete. Feedback from this patient may give other patients who are thinking of hair transplant a negative impression. In hair transplantation, the administration of local anesthesia itself is a little painful, but once this process is complete there should be no further pain involved if the patient is correctly managed.

Since the hair transplant sessions are lengthy it is necessary that patients are given proper pain relief for that period of time. The following are some of the methods that a hair surgeon can apply to alleviate pain during hair transplant procedures.

1. Decrease a patient’s anxiety – The fear of pain makes any patient anxious.

a. Hence don’t keep the patient waiting. If he needs to wait, then prior intimation would put him at ease and he can go around the locality to relax himself by way of window shopping, going to a restaurant etc. and arrive a few minutes before the procedure is set to begin.

b. Let the ambience of the surgeons work area be casual with some music to soothe the nerves.

c. Be friendly while talking with your patient and also supportive.

d. Avoid display of all your gadgets such as needles, syringes and surgical instruments so that the patient does not feel confined.

2. Premedication – to reduce anxiety and at the same time keep him in communication for the surgeon to interact, the patient may be given 20mg of diazepam 30-45 minutes before the procedure. Diazepam is a benzodiazepine which is the most commonly used drug. Triazolam and lorazepam are the other two common drugs of the same class that are administered orally. When the threshold of pain in patients is on the higher side, narcotics such as pethidine or paracetamol are given in addition to diazepam. Since the use of narcotics induces nausea and vomiting in patients, the drug rofecoxib is used to alleviate this problem. While diazepam counteracts neurological effects of lidocaine toxicity, roficoxib is gentle on the gastric lining of the stomach and has been reported to have no adverse effect on blood platelets. When intravenous administration of pethidine or midazolam is undertaken, it is mandatory that these drugs be administered under the care of a trained anesthetist and anesthesiologist so that the drug monitoring is done by experts. A few hair transplant surgeons use nitrous oxide for sedation since its effect evaporates away sooner than the other intravenous drugs after the procedure. It is very important that the age, weight and other medical conditions of the patient is taken into account before administering anesthesia as these conditions are variable.

3. How to administer the drugs or infiltration techniques – When the surgeon anesthetizes a small area and then administers the rest of the anesthesia, the pain caused by insertion of needles is minimized. Also, low pressure and slow administration of the drugs decrease pain caused when the drug is getting into the system. The drugs are always injected in the dermis region for maximum effect and the nerves on the scalp are desensitisized by ring block in which the nerves in the area in which the surgeon has to work on are blocked of any feeling. Dr. Nusbaum anesthetizes the donor area first for harvest and then the recipient area for transplant in order to minimize the use of these drugs at a given time.

4. Use of nerve blocks as an alternate to ring blocks – In the scalp region two nerves namely the supraorbital and supratrochlear which cater to the front region of the scalp are desensitized. This is done by injecting 0.5% of 1-2mL lidocaine and subsequently another 0.5 mL of the solution in the periosteum which is a dense fibrous membrane covering the cranium. This procedure is done on either side of the head. Patients who have been under nerve blocks have had pain reduction up to 95%. When the nerve block is not carried out under supervision, there is a possibility of the patient experiencing damage to the nerves leading to abnormal skin sensations such as tingling, burning or itching.

5. Reducing pain while injecting anesthesia – Apart from distracting the patient to reduce anxiety during anesthesia administration, the method of needle insertion, speed with which the solution is injected, temperature and pH of the solution all form an integral part of reducing pain during the process. Some of the common practices followed prior to injecting anesthesia are as follows –

a. Ice packs – Ice packs, cryogel packs, frozen metal plates and spraying of Freon or ethyl chloride applied 30 seconds before using the needle helps the patient in lessening pain. This technique is usually combined with other techniques for best possible effects.

b. Lidocaine Iontophoresis – In this method, 4% lidocaine mixed with epinephrine in the ratio 1:50000 is transferred as ions on the skin surface using an electric field. The application is however restricted to bald regions because regions with hair may be a hindrance to the ion transfer.

c. Topical local anesthesia – is a time consuming and unwieldy option where in different anesthetic drugs are mixed and applied on the skin surface one and half to two hours before the main anesthetic is injected. Although the skin becomes numb, the subsequent injections can still be painful. It is time consuming because of the extra time required prior to the anesthesia administration and unwieldy because it is not handy when the hair transplant surgeon is pressed for time.

d. Needle-less injectors – are devices that transfer certain amount of anesthesia under air pressure directly through the skin. However, patients sometimes feel this pressure as painful.

e. Buffering of anesthesia – The presence of preservatives in the anesthesia solutions decreases the pH of the solution which is counterbalanced by adding buffers such as sodium bi carbonate to raise the pH. The rise in pH decreases pain during administration, but after the surgery many patients experience puffiness in the injected regions. Hence its use is usually restricted to the donor region.

f. Temperature of local anesthesia – warming of local anesthesia to 37-40 deg C combined with buffering is seen to reduce pain as compared with the non buffered solution at room temperature. This technique has been adapted from dental practitioners for hair transplants.

g. Vibratory stimulus – In this method a hand held battery vibratory device is used to massage the area where local anesthesia is to be injected. In comparison with the donor and recipient sites, the donor site is shown to be benefited to a large extent. Since the number of patients who have undergone this method is limited, the effective use of this method can be vouched for only after extensive study.

h. Computerized anesthesia injectors – This technique is prevalent in dentistry and the same has been extended to hair transplants. In this method an instrument called a ‘Wand’ is used, which is a computerized instrument that can inject anesthesia at a controlled and slow rate thereby helping in uniform distribution and reducing tissue distension during administration. The procedure takes some time due to which it can be used as a good option for initiating ring blocks in the donor and recipient sites. The advantage of using a Wand is its controllability and the design which is pleasing to the patients and almost no post operative puffiness of the areas worked on.

6. How to maintain local anesthesia – Since a hair transplant procedure is time consuming, it is necessary that the patient is maintained at an optimum level of anesthesia so that he can still effectively communicate with the hair surgeon when he starts to feel a drop in the anesthetic effect. The age of a patient is a determining factor in administering anesthesia. In younger patients the effect evaporates away faster and more so in the frontal region as compared to the donor area. The most commonly used local anesthesia for hair transplant is lidocaine while some surgeons use bupivacaine or the two in combination with epinephrine as a carrier for prolonged effect. Lidocaine has a faster effect than bupivacaine and has no cardiac toxicity as seen to occur with bupivacaine.

A patient is always encouraged by the surgeon to communicate when the effect of anesthesia is diminishing. However, the surgeon can anticipate a reduction in anesthesia effect when the transplanted site experiences increased bleeding. In patients who have the tendency to bleed more naturally, the surgeons use epinephrine before preparing the recipient site for the hair transplant. When excess epinephrine administration can be toxic, various other methods of controlling blood loss such as identifying bleeding patterns in patients prior to surgery, stoppage of medications that lead to thinning of blood, controlling blood pressure, optimum sitting or lying down positions of the patients during surgery, use of lighting systems that do not generate heat and allowing the patient to smoke if he is a heavy smoker, are all useful strategies.

Lower blood loss and longer anesthetic effect can also be achieved by the method of using tumescent anesthesia. In this method, lidocaine and epinephrine are administered at a certain pressure so that the blood vessels in the injected skin are blocked temporarily. The result is better permeation of the anesthesia and in the process deep seated vessels are protected. The procedure can be done 10-15 minutes before the donor harvest and recipient site preparation. This procedure has certain post operative disadvantages such as a high level of edema or puffiness of the recipient sites, grafts popping out from their insertion incisions and dimpling of the scalp skin that makes the grafts seem like they have been placed in small pits.

7. Pain after the surgery – During the first week after surgery, most patients feel uneasy in the donor area mainly due to the sutures. Once they are removed a patient feels much more comfortable. In the recipient sites however, the patient may complain of burning sensations for a short period of time 30-45 after surgery. Normally a patient starts to feel pain 1 or 2 hrs after completion of the procedure. To prevent this, surgeons inject bupivacaine when the surgery is almost coming to a close. In some instances, ice packs have been used to alleviate pain. Patients are also prescribed acetaminophen for the first week if he feels some pain.

Less pain equals more confidence in both the doctor in question and the surgical process and this aspect proportionally increases the number of patients who can opt for hair transplant treatment as a viable choice to combat hair loss.


Hair transplant associated pain reduction techniques references

  • Nusbaum BP. Techniques to reduce pain associated with hair transplantation: optimizing anesthesia and analgesia. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5(1):9-15. Review. PMID: 14979739
  • Whalen K, Rabinovitz HS, Oliviero MC. Microprocessor-controlled local anesthesia versus the conventional syringe technique in hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):113; discussion 113-4. PMID: 12534526
  • Swinehart JM. Local anesthesia in hair transplant surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Dec;28(12):1189. No abstract available. PMID: 12472507
  • Seager DJ, Simmons C. Local anesthesia in hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Apr;28(4):320-8. PMID: 11966789
  • Field LM, Namias A. Bilevel tumescent anesthetic infiltration for hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg. 1997 Apr;23(4):289-90. PMID: 9149797
  • Hunstad JP. The tumescent technique facilitates hair micrografting. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996 Winter;20(1):43-8. PMID: 8746470
  • Sadick NS, Militana CJ. Use of nitrous oxide in hair transplantation surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994 Mar;20(3):186-90. PMID: 8151032

Top of the page

Copyright ©. All Rights Reserved
http://www.keratin.com
Top of the page