The evolution of hair transplants from simple experimentation to advanced medical procedure

Hair transplantation, an effective and permanent solution for hair loss, boasts a rich history dating back to at least the 19th century. The journey from the initial conceptualization to modern techniques has been marked by steady evolution, numerous experiments, and significant breakthroughs.

The idea of transplanting hair began in the early to mid-1800s with studies involving the transplantation of hair follicles or feathers from animals and birds. These experiments, however, were not focused on developing a cure for human hair loss. The credit for making the connection between hair transplantation and a potential solution for baldness goes to Dom Unger. Unger’s student, Johann Friedrich Dieffenbach, took the idea further and performed the first recorded hair transplant on a human in 1822. He inserted six hair follicles from his scalp into his arm using a needle. Although four of them were lost due to drying out or inflammation, two survived and continued to grow, marking a significant milestone in hair transplantation history.

Despite Dieffenbach’s achievement, progress in hair transplantation research was slow for the next century. The major developments during this period occurred in Japan. In the 1930s and 1940s, Japanese doctors Sasagawa, Okuda, and Tamura made significant strides in advancing hair transplant techniques. They developed methods to treat baldness with hair transplantation, including full-thickness autografts, single hair grafting, and hair shaft insertion. Unfortunately, their studies were not widely recognized outside of Japan due to language barriers and the disruptions of World War II.

In the 1950s, the field of hair transplantation witnessed another significant milestone. American doctor Norman Orentreich introduced a method known as punch grafting and published his findings on the principle of donor dominance. This principle established that hair follicles retain their original characteristics even when moved to a different area of the body. For instance, hair follicles from a non-balding region will continue to grow hair even when transplanted to a balding region. Orentreich’s study confirmed the viability of hair transplants as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia and sparked widespread interest in the technique.

However, the early punch graft method had drawbacks. The use of large grafts resulted in an unnatural “pluggy” look that resembled tufts of hair on a doll’s head. Over time, surgeons realized the need for smaller grafts for a more natural appearance. This led to the development of minigrafts, smaller pieces of grafts that were divided from the traditional 4mm plugs or squares.

Around the same period, there was a shift in the tools used for the procedure. Surgeons started using scalpels instead of punches to harvest the hair grafts, leading to the development of multi-bladed knives. These knives, designed to cut a strip of donor grafts, marked a significant improvement in the harvesting process. The shift to using scalpels also led to the popularization of donor graft harvesting using multi-bladed knives.

In the 1980s and 1990s, the hair transplant field continued to evolve with further refinement of the grafting techniques. Emanuel Marritt and Rolf Nordström introduced the concept of mini and micrografts. These smaller grafts produced a less tufted and more natural appearance. While these refined techniques improved the aesthetic results of hair transplants, they also made the procedures more labor-intensive and costly.

The most significant advancement in hair transplantation came in the mid-1990s with the introduction of follicular unit transplantation (FUT) by Dr. Bob Limmer. FUT involves dissecting the donor strip of hair follicles into their natural groupings, or “follicular units “, typically containing one to four hair follicles. This method allowed surgeons to transplant the follicular units with their supporting structures, such as sebaceous glands, nerves, and a small amount of connective tissue, intact. The aim was to mimic the natural hair growth pattern as closely as possible, yielding more aesthetically pleasing results.

The concept of follicular units also paved the way for a new harvesting technique known as follicular unit extraction (FUE), introduced in the early 2000s. FUE involves the extraction of individual follicular units directly from the donor site, rather than excising a strip of scalp skin. This technique, unlike FUT, does not leave a linear scar on the donor site, making it an appealing option for patients who prefer shorter haircuts or those with a predisposition to keloid scarring. However, FUE is more time-consuming and demands a higher level of surgical skill.

With the advent of FUE, the field of hair transplantation began embracing the use of technology to improve precision and efficiency. Robotic FUE systems were introduced to automate the extraction process. These systems utilize advanced algorithms to identify and extract follicular units, reducing human error and fatigue. As of the 2020s, regenerative medicine has started to influence the field of hair transplantation. Researchers are now exploring methods to clone hair follicles or induce existing hair follicles to produce more hair.

Despite these advances, hair transplantation still has room for improvement. While current techniques can achieve natural-looking results, they are limited by the availability of donor hair. In addition, the procedures are still quite labor-intensive, requiring a high level of skill and expertise. Future developments may focus on overcoming these limitations, perhaps through the use of stem cells or gene therapy to stimulate the growth of new hair follicles.

From humble beginnings as a simple experiment in the 19th century, hair transplantation has evolved into a sophisticated medical procedure, offering hope to millions of people suffering from hair loss. As we look to the future, the continued refinement of techniques and the integration of emerging technologies and biological therapies promise to make hair transplantation even more effective and accessible.


Dieffenbach JF. Nonnulla de regeneratione et transplantatione: Diss. inaug. Typis Richterianis; 1822. 60 p.
Okuda S. Clinical and experimental studies of transplantation of living hairs. Jpn J Dermatol Urol. 1939;46:1–11.
Hauben DJ, Baruchin A, Mahler D. On the History of the Free Skin Graft. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1982 Sep;9(3):242.
Uebel CO. Micrografts and Minigrafts: A New Approach for Baldness Surgery. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 1991 Nov;27(5):476.
Bernstein RM, Rassman WR, Seager D, Shapiro R, Cooley JE, Norwood OT, et al. Standardizing the Classification and Description of Follicular Unit Transplantation and Mini-Micrografting Techniques: Dermatologic Surgery. 1998;24(9):957–61.
Unger WPU Ronald Shapiro , Robin Unger , Mark, editor. Hair Transplantation, Fifth Edition. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019. 554 p.
Anastassakis K. The History of Hair Transplantation. In: Anastassakis K, editor. Androgenetic Alopecia From A to Z: Vol3 Hair Restoration Surgery, Alternative Treatments, and Hair Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 13–9.