There’s an unusual question buzzing in the field of robotics these days: should robots have hair? As odd as it may seem, this question opens up a broader conversation about how we want our robotic companions to look and behave, and what practical functions these features may serve.
To begin, let’s address the elephant in the room: the uncanny valley. This term, coined by the Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970, refers to the discomfort we feel when we encounter a robot that looks almost, but not quite, human. The hypothesis suggests that the more humanoid a robot is, the more empathetic we feel towards it—until it becomes too similar to us, which then triggers a sense of unease. This discomfort could be mitigated if the robot is designed to be clearly non-human, or if it is made so convincingly human-like that we can’t tell the difference. Therefore, if robots were to have hair, it should be so convincingly real that it doesn’t add to the uncanny valley effect.
But what about practicality? Hair, in biological creatures, serves various functions like temperature regulation, protection, and even social signaling. In the context of robotics, hair could function as an additional sensor. Hair-like structures could be engineered to detect changes in the environment, like wind direction, temperature, or even the presence of certain chemicals. This could add a layer of functionality to robots, particularly those designed for exploration or disaster response.
Furthermore, robots with hair could be beneficial in therapeutic settings. Robotic pets, used in therapeutic contexts such as with the elderly or those with dementia, can offer comfort and companionship without the need for care that real pets require. A furry exterior could make these robots more appealing and comforting to interact with, thereby enhancing their effectiveness.
However, the question of aesthetics also comes into play. We’re social creatures, and our interactions are influenced by how things look. Robots with hair, particularly humanoid robots, could appear more approachable and less intimidating. This could be particularly important in roles where robots interact closely with humans, like in healthcare or customer service.
Despite these potential benefits, there are also significant challenges to consider. For one, creating convincingly realistic hair for robots would be a complex and potentially expensive undertaking. Hair is one of the most challenging aspects to replicate in computer graphics and animatronics, let alone in fully functional robots. Besides, the maintenance aspect cannot be overlooked. Hair could get dirty, tangled, or damaged, adding to the maintenance needs of the robot.
Moreover, there’s the risk of reinforcing unnecessary human norms on robots. If we start giving robots hair, do we then also decide on gender, race, or age? By projecting human characteristics onto robots, we might unintentionally reinforce societal biases and stereotypes, which is an ethical concern that should be taken into account.
In conclusion, should robots have hair? The answer is complex and largely depends on the purpose of the robot. Hair could add an extra layer of functionality, provide therapeutic benefits, and make robots seem more approachable. However, it also brings with it practical challenges and ethical considerations. The debate ultimately highlights the broader question about how we want to design and interact with our robotic counterparts, a question that is becoming increasingly relevant as robotics continue to advance.
Ribi FN, Yokoyama A, Turner DC. Comparison of Children’s Behavior toward Sony’s Robotic Dog AIBO and a Real Dog: A Pilot Study. Anthrozoös. 2008;21(3):245–56.
Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA. Animal-Assisted Therapy and Loneliness in Nursing Homes: Use of Robotic versus Living Dogs. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2008 Mar 1;9(3):173–7.
Mori M, MacDorman KF, Kageki N. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 2012 Jun;19(2):98–100.
Haefelin N, Lange N, Sweigert B, Yonto M, Rivardo MG. Anxiety Reduction in College Students after Brief Interaction with a Therapy Dog or Animatronic Dog. North American Journal of Psychology. 2020 Sep 1;22(3):411–411.
Sayegh MA, Daraghma H, Mekid S, Bashmal S. Review of Recent Bio-Inspired Design and Manufacturing of Whisker Tactile Sensors. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;22(7):2705.
Introduction: The integumentary structures of birds and mammals have intrigued evolutionary biologists for years. A significant query involves the evolutionary…
Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show (non-) personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.